Aug 17

“Florence Foster Jenkins”: Her Delusions

As I’ve already provided a synopsis of one recent movie version of the life and ambitions of Florence Foster Jenkins (the 2016 Margueritesee previous post), I won’t review the current biopic starring Meryl Streep. Instead, this post will delve more deeply into this woman’s state of mind.

I will, however, provide the movie trailer for the new Florence Foster Jenkins:

The adjective I’ve seen most often applied to the depiction of Florence Foster Jenkins is “delusional.” Why? Because she wholeheartedly believes she can sing capably—and there’s absolutely no question that she’s so so wrong.

My favorite review title, in fact, belongs to Bob Mondello, NPR: “Meryl Streep’s Singer Has Delusions Of Adequacy In ‘Florence Foster Jenkins’.” While Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle, calls our heroine “an emblem of the self-delusion that everyone, to some degree, shares.”

How can one have delusions, though, if not schizophrenic or otherwise psychotic? One possible answer is the diagnosis of delusional disorder, a newer term that in the past was considered part of paranoia. As defined by Psychology Today: “Delusional disorder refers to a condition associated with one or more nonbizarre delusions of thinking—such as expressing beliefs that occur in real life such as being poisoned, being stalked, being loved or deceived, or having an illness, provided no other symptoms of schizophrenia are exhibited…”

Importantly, it’s also expressly stated that the delusion could be of the “grandiose type (patient believes that he has some great but unrecognized talent or insight”).

The hitch, though, is in the following prerequisite for making a diagnosis of delusional disorder: “(T)hese delusions are not due to a medical condition or substance abuse.”

Florence Foster Jenkins lets the audience know that she’d contracted syphilis at a young age. And we’re talking about an era—she lived until the 1940’s—when one could not be treated effectively. As antibiotics were not yet discovered when she contracted syphilis, nothing could stop the progression. Alas, later-stage syphilis can cause significant mental alteration and problems.

Although the doctor who in the film visits Florence at home declares her not to be in the tertiary stage of syphilis, in real life it’s more likely that she was, as she’d probably been living with the disease at least since early adulthood. In the film she’s in her 70’s.

States Dana Stevens, Slate, about the way Florence Foster Jenkins handles this subject: “Though the script, written by British TV veteran Nicholas Martin, is frank about Jenkins’ decadeslong decline from syphilis (which she caught from a quickly divorced and swept-under-the-rug first husband), it glosses over theories that the disease might have been responsible for her exhibitionistic tendencies and eccentric performance style.”

To recap thus far, one possible conclusion about Florence’s state of mind involves late-stage syphilis—but we’ll never know for sure. Another theory: she had the delusional disorder described above.

A third possibility? Her singular delusion springs simply from a deep lack of self-awareness, which is an inability to see oneself “clearly and objectively through reflection and introspection” (

Florence, after all, was famously protected from reality testing by her common-law spouse St. Clair Bayfield, played by Hugh Grant in the current film, as well as by every ingratiating person around her desirous of the benefit of her wealth and generosity. (It’s unclear how much this was true of Bayfield, who did appear to love her.)

At any rate and for whatever reasons, Florence both in real life and in the two biographical movie(s) I’ve now seen did notably fail to notice how badly she sang. As Dana Stevens (Slate) so aptly and relevantly concludes: “In the end, this is a sweet, uplifting comedy with a message that might not stand up to extended scrutiny in the political climate of the moment: Follow your dreams wherever they lead you, even at the expense of correctly apprehending reality.”

Apr 15

“Marguerite” Follows Her Discordant Dream

“Marguerite” is a dark delight, a cringe comedy that skirts tragedy throughout, examining delusion, entitlement, denial and the question of whether the truth is essential. Tom Long, Detroit News, about film Marguerite 

Is it always right to follow your dreams? Most readily say yes, but the film Marguerite, which follows the title character (Catherine Frot) as she pursues hers, may make you think twice. (Incidentally, Marguerite has been followed by an American remake, Florence Foster Jenkins, starring Meryl Streep).

“Cover your ears and open your hearts,” says Peter Debruge, Variety, about this award-winning film and its off-key protagonist: “In French director Xavier Giannoli’s pitch-perfect comedy of manners, ‘Marguerite,’ a shameless chanteuse with a surplus of money and a shortage of talent buys her way into the spotlight, exposing the hypocrisy of her unctuous social circle in the process.”

The Trailer

More About Baroness Marguerite Dumont

Tom Long, Detroit News: “…(H)ere’s what no one has ever told Marguerite: She’s an absolutely awful singer, resolutely off-key and hard to bear.”

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: “To her ears, she sounds like Maria Callas or Joan Sutherland, and she is so sweet-natured and so devoted to music that no one will give her the bad news.”

Tirdad Derakhshani, “She may be crazy, but Marguerite is gentle, generous, and loving. She has the purity of heart lacking in people who are sane enough to manipulate, cheat, and lie.”

What About Her Social Circle?

Ty Burr, Boston Globe: “Underneath the grandeur, she’s a neglected wife, with a husband, Georges (Andre Marcon), who’s mortified by her pretensions and is having an affair with her best friend, (Astrid Whettnall), to boot.”

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: “She has a coterie of people willing to humor her — a husband devoted to preserving her self-delusion, a critic charmed by her spirit, a Dadaist artist who actually thinks she’s good (or so bad she’s good), a voice teacher coerced and paid to give lessons, and a group of friends with a rare gift for sitting in an audience and keeping a straight face.”

Other Themes Explored

Dave Calhoun, Time Out: “What’s interesting about Giannoli’s film is that it poses sharp questions about the nature of art and who it’s for. Is something necessarily worthless if everyone perceives it as crap? Or is there a purity that comes with artistic expression entirely unshaped by fashion?”

Ty Burr, Boston Globe: “On one level, ‘Marguerite’ is about a ruined post-World War I Europe learning to feel again through the example of a woman convinced of beauty where there is none. On another, it’s about a husband choosing to love his wife for who she is rather than what he wants her to be. On a third, it’s about the power and limits of belief. On a fourth, it’s a portrait of a madwoman. On a fifth, of an angel.”

Overall Reviews

Michael O’Sullivan, Washington Post: “Although there are moments of real humor, mainly having to with Marguerite’s painfully obvious inability to carry a tune, the movie is less funny ha-ha than it is poignantly, perplexingly wry. If we’re invited to laugh at Marguerite from time to time, we’re also given the opportunity to understand her, or to at least care enough to try.”

Stephen Holden, New York Times: “Like a self-enraptured, attention-starved diva who can’t tear herself away from the stage after the applause has faded, ‘Marguerite’ overstays its welcome by at least 20 minutes. What redeems it is Ms. Frot’s subtle, deeply compassionate portrayal of a rich, lonely woman clutching at an impossible dream until reality intrudes.”

Michael Phillips, Chicago Tribune: “‘Marguerite’ achieves what the protagonist herself never managed: perfect pitch.”